Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a weight of 245g / 8,64oz, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a durability of 5.72 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
