Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
