Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C3000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C3000X offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
