Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
