Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
