Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the weight (250g / 8,82oz). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn International VISW?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
