Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
