Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Beastmaster offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
