Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
76.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
