Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Beastmaster is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Shimano FX?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
