Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 3000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.76 out of 10) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
