Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and total score (7.76 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
