Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa BG
Spinning
69.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.79 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €108.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 4000X clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and durability (7.79 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa BG 4000X
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX
