Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
