Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
