Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX and Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX offers a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, while Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX stands out for a durability of 5.68 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn International VISW?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
