Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (235g / 8,29oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
