Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a weight of 520g / 18,34oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
