Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

Shimano Catana FE

Spinning

53.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.74 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight320g / 11.29oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €34.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

78.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (7 out of 10) and weight (280g / 9,88oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.