Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X

Shimano Catana FE, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, CAT4000FE
Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €34.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Mitchell 300, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1428054
Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €45.50
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Mitchell 300 4000X clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in weight (268g / 9,45oz) and ergonomics (6.11 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell 300 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Mitchell 300?

There are not much differences between the two comparables