Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.98 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn International VISW?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
