Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Catana FE

Spinning

63.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.67 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €30.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

83.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs

Weight160g / 5.64oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 SH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.33 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a maximum drag of 8,5kg / 18,74lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues