Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE C 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.73 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano Catana FE C 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
