Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
