Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Complex XR 2500X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR 2500X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
