Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.76 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
