Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.4 out of 10) and durability (5.67 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
