Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
