Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
