Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.92 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (7.76 out of 10) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
