Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (185g / 6,53oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
