Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
