Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
