Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
57.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €67.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 180g / 6,35oz and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
