Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
