Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
