Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (7) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
