Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
