Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X
