Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sienna 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sienna 4000X and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sienna 4000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Sienna?
Shimano Sienna 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
