Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a weight of 220g / 7,76oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
