Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

Multireels

73.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.73 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.2:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight1230g / 43.39oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €622.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

84.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €229.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3012QD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (285g / 10,05oz) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX

The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting