Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Beastmaster


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
