Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin INKS 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
