Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.73 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
