Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
