Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX stands out for a ball bearings of 6+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Stradic FM?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
