Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.1:1) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
