Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight180g / 6.35oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €416.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

83.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €230.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2508QD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX edges out Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.