Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
