Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa BG 4000X
